Galt's Gulch Goes South
Billionaires leaving California, other blue states over tax threats
California's proposed billionaire wealth tax, Washington's new millionaire levy, and New York's mounting fiscal siege are accelerating the largest voluntary relocation of capital and talent in American peacetime history — with Florida and Texas the clear winners.
March 22, 2026 · San Diego, CA
Progressive lawmakers across California, Washington state, and New York City are simultaneously advancing wealth taxes, millionaire surcharges, and retroactive levies on high-net-worth individuals — generating a documented and measurable exodus of billionaires, entrepreneurs, and capital to zero-income-tax havens, primarily Florida and Texas. The legal viability of California's proposed retroactive wealth tax is deeply uncertain under multiple federal constitutional doctrines. Academic research on tax-induced migration presents a genuinely mixed picture: systematic outflows are modest under normal conditions, but COVID-era mobility changes may have altered long-run behavioral norms. What is not in dispute is the anecdotal signal currently flashing at extraordinary intensity: the names, addresses, and property-purchase receipts of America's wealthiest citizens are being rewritten in real time.
In 1957 Ayn Rand imagined a revolt of the productive class. In her telling, they retreated to a hidden Colorado valley rather than continue to shoulder a civilization that increasingly punished their success. In 2026, the retreat is decidedly more tropical. The gulch is Indian Creek, Florida — a private island off Miami Beach so exclusive it is known simply as "the Billionaire Bunker" — and the rebels are arriving by private jet with nine-figure real estate offers in hand.
The proximate cause is a collision of aggressive tax proposals across three Democratic-controlled states, each ratcheting up pressure on high-net-worth residents at precisely the moment remote-work norms have made geographic mobility more feasible than at any prior point in American history. The result is a wealth migration story that is simultaneously an economic experiment, a constitutional law drama, and a political miscalculation with potentially devastating long-run fiscal consequences for the states doing the taxing.
California's Billionaire Tax Act
On October 22, 2025, the Service Employees International Union's healthcare division filed a ballot initiative with the California Attorney General titled the "2026 Billionaire Tax Act." An amendment was filed on November 26, 2025. If organizers gather the 874,641 valid signatures required by June 24, 2026, Californians will vote in November on a proposal to impose a one-time 5 percent tax on the net worth of any individual with assets exceeding $1 billion who resided in California as of January 1, 2026. The roughly 200 affected billionaires collectively control an estimated $2 trillion in assets; the tax is projected to raise approximately $100 billion, directed primarily toward healthcare funding gutted by the Trump administration's federal spending cuts.
— REP. KEVIN KILEY (R-CA)
What makes the proposal constitutionally exotic — and practically threatening — is its retroactivity. The January 1, 2026 residency date for tax liability predates when the initiative could possibly be enacted, which would be after the November 2026 election. That means the tax would be assessed based on a past condition of residence in a state whose law did not yet impose the tax at the time of that residence. The initiative also purports to reach individuals who have since departed California, in an attempt to prevent what the drafters call "domicile gaming." The California Secretary of State approved the proposed initiative for circulation on December 26, 2025.
The pre-deadline flight was immediate and pronounced. Before January 1, 2026 — the critical residency date — Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin left California for Miami. Venture capitalist Peter Thiel relocated to Miami. Car-loan magnate Don Hankey departed for Las Vegas. Former Uber CEO Travis Kalanick announced a December move to Texas. Steven Spielberg became a New York City resident on New Year's Day, though his representative said the director had long planned the move to be closer to family. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg also reportedly departed California, though after the January 1 deadline, as did venture capitalist David Sacks, whose firm Craft Ventures relocated to Austin. Public filings reviewed by Fox News Digital at the California Secretary of State's office showed several business entities linked to Sergey Brin — including his family office Koop LLC and his influenza research fund Flu Lab LLC — transferred out of state in December, with his flying-car venture One Aero now listing a Florida address. Oracle founder Larry Ellison has also taken steps signaling a California pullback.
Just six confirmed departures ahead of the January 1 deadline removed an estimated $27 billion in potential tax revenue — roughly 27 cents of every projected dollar — before the initiative had even qualified for the ballot, according to Fortune's analysis published March 17, 2026. Entrepreneur David Friedberg, citing a private poll of affected individuals, estimated that 80 to 90 percent surveyed said they had already left California in 2025 or would leave in 2026 if the ballot measure appeared likely to pass, representing an estimated $2 to $2.5 trillion in assets and some $20 billion in annual state income tax revenue. The figures are contested but the directional signal is not.
Dormant Commerce Clause: The tax must satisfy the "Complete Auto" four-part test, including fair apportionment and non-discrimination against interstate commerce. Retroactive application to former residents appears to fail the nexus and apportionment prongs.
Due Process — Retroactivity: The Supreme Court has indicated heightened scrutiny for "wholly new" tax structures applied retroactively. The tax obligation date (Jan. 1, 2026) precedes enactment (post-Nov. 2026 election) by nearly a year.
Right to Interstate Travel: Under Shapiro v. Thompson, any law penalizing the exercise of the fundamental right to travel is unconstitutional absent a compelling governmental interest narrowly tailored to achieve it. Taxing someone for having previously lived in California is textbook deterrence of mobility.
Takings Clause: A forced transfer of 5 percent of net worth — covering unrealized gains and illiquid assets — may constitute a taking of private property without just compensation under both the U.S. and California Constitutions.
Governor Gavin Newsom has publicly opposed the measure, calling it "really damaging to the state" and vowing to work for its defeat. San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan warned that "driving billionaires out of state might feel good in the short run, but working people will pick up the tab, as the top 1% already account for 40 to 50 percent of California's income tax revenue." On the other side, Senator Bernie Sanders barnstormed the state in support of the initiative. The SEIU's measure requires the signature threshold to be cleared — a challenging but not impossible task that organizers were still pursuing as of this writing.
Opponents have organized aggressively. Sergey Brin donated $20 million to a group called Building a Better California, which is circulating three counter-measures: one to prevent retroactive taxes, one to narrow the definition of California residency, and one to otherwise limit the initiative's reach. Two additional PACs — Stop the Squeeze and Golden State Promise — have also launched. Congressman Kevin Kiley (R-CA) introduced federal legislation that would prohibit any state from imposing retroactive taxes on individuals who no longer reside there. Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan wrote on X that supporters of the wealth tax were "trying to kill and eat the golden goose of technology startups in California."
Washington State Ends Its Tax Exceptionalism
Washington state had spent 93 years resisting an income tax, a point of genuine political identity in the Pacific Northwest. That streak ended on March 9, 2026, when state lawmakers passed SB 6346 along party lines after the longest floor debate in state legislative history — more than 25 hours and 81 amendments, in a House vote of 52 to 46. The bill imposes a 9.9 percent tax on personal income above $1 million per year for individuals or households, affecting roughly 21,000 filers — less than one half of one percent of the state's population. The revenue, estimated at $3.5 to $4 billion annually once the tax takes effect in 2029, is earmarked to fund free K-12 school meals, expand the Working Families Tax Credit to 460,000 additional households, and provide sales tax relief on diapers, over-the-counter medications, and personal hygiene products. Governor Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, signed it into law.
The economic ripple effect was immediate. Starbucks founder Howard Schultz — worth an estimated $6.6 billion according to Bloomberg, a 44-year Seattle resident who built the company from a single-location coffee bean seller into a global enterprise — announced on LinkedIn on the day of the House vote that he and his wife were relocating to Miami for "our next adventure together." He paid approximately $44 million for a five-bedroom penthouse at the Surf Club, Four Seasons Private Residences in Surfside, Florida. His family office is moving to Miami; his Schultz Family Foundation will remain in Seattle. He did not explicitly cite the tax but wrote that it was his "hope that Washington will remain a place for business and entrepreneurship to thrive."
Schultz is not the first prominent Washingtonian to vote with his feet. Jeff Bezos departed Seattle for Miami in 2023, citing proximity to family — a move that did not appear unrelated to Washington's 2022 capital gains tax of 7 percent. CNBC reported that Bezos unloaded 50 million Amazon shares ahead of a January 2025 deadline, with the transactions posted to Florida, saving him more than $600 million in capital gains taxes he would otherwise have owed Washington state. Starbucks itself announced it is opening a new corporate office in Nashville, Tennessee, aligning with its geographic expansion strategy in the Southeast.
The Tax Foundation analyzed the new Washington levy and found that when combined with two existing Seattle wage taxes and a statewide uncapped payroll tax, the effective top rate on wage income in Seattle would exceed 18 percent — the highest in the country. The burden falls most heavily on small business owners and on tech workers whose compensation includes restricted stock units that vest as ordinary income. Kristofer Johnson, president of the Association of Washington Business, warned the tax "will unfortunately cause more small- and medium-sized business owners to seriously consider starting, growing or moving their business to other states with a more stable tax environment." Seattle Seahawks General Manager John Schneider acknowledged the tax is "going to sting from a recruiting standpoint."
New York City's Fiscal Standoff
New York City has its own escalating tax drama, though it has not yet resolved. Mayor Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist elected in 2025, entered office in January 2026 facing a $5.4 billion budget deficit, a shortfall compounded by the Trump administration's cuts to federal assistance for healthcare and food programs. Mamdani's proposed remedy is a 2 percentage point increase in the city's top income tax rate — from 3.9 percent to 5.9 percent — on earners above $1 million, which combined with existing state rates would produce a combined top marginal rate of roughly 17 percent on the highest earners in New York City, the highest in the country.
Mamdani has pledged to use the revenue for free citywide bus service, universal childcare from six weeks of age, frozen rents on rent-stabilized apartments, and city-owned grocery stores. He faces a critical obstacle: Governor Kathy Hochul, who has repeatedly and forcefully refused to support any income tax increase. "I need people who are high net worth to support the generous social programs that we have in our state," she said at a Politico forum. "I don't want to lose any more people to Palm Beach." When former Governor Andrew Cuomo was running against Mamdani in the primary, he quipped that if Mamdani won, "even I will move to Florida."
Both the state Senate and Assembly included versions of Mamdani's tax proposals in their March 2026 budget counterproposals — a tax hike on income above $5 million and an increase in the state corporate tax rate from 7.25 to 9 percent — setting up a budget showdown with Hochul ahead of the April 1 state fiscal deadline. A Siena poll found 54 percent of New Yorkers statewide support the millionaire tax, with 62 percent support in New York City. Hochul has said she is "unwavering" in her opposition to raising personal income taxes.
The Cato Institute published a report warning that Mamdani's corporate tax increase and income surcharge would tempt high-earning New Yorkers to relocate to Long Island and the lower Hudson Valley — where they could remain geographically proximate to the city while escaping its tax reach — rather than flee to Florida outright. The Empire Center estimated that millionaires would account for 60 percent of revenues if Mamdani's proposals took effect, and noted that city millionaires already represent roughly 40 percent of the city's income tax revenues despite comprising about 1 percent of its population.
The Receiving End: Florida's Gold Coast
| Individual | Origin State | Notable Action |
|---|---|---|
| Larry Page (Google) | California | $173M+ purchase of two Coconut Grove estates, late 2025 |
| Mark Zuckerberg (Meta) | California | $170M Indian Creek estate (Miami-Dade record); left CA after Jan. 1 deadline |
| Sergey Brin (Google) | California | Left CA before Jan. 1; $50M Allison Island purchase reported |
| Peter Thiel (Founders Fund) | California | Relocated to Miami; Founders Fund Miami office since 2021 |
| Howard Schultz (Starbucks) | Washington | $44M Surf Club penthouse, Surfside, FL; departed day of millionaire tax vote |
| Jeff Bezos (Amazon) | Washington | Relocated to Miami 2023; sold $9B+ in Amazon shares from FL, saving $600M+ |
| Ken Griffin (Citadel) | Illinois | Relocated HQ and personal residence to Miami; multiple South Florida acquisitions |
| Travis Kalanick (Uber) | California | Relocated to Texas, December 2025 |
| David Sacks (Craft Ventures) | California | Firm relocated to Austin, TX |
The numbers behind the flight are no longer merely anecdotal. South Florida posted 361 home sales above $10 million in 2025 — the second highest total in history, trailing only the pandemic-era record of 444 set in 2021. Sales of homes above $30 million in Miami-Dade County increased by approximately 1,800 percent between 2018 and 2025, from one transaction to nineteen. Miami's Fisher Island (ZIP code 33109) surpassed Atherton, California as the nation's most expensive ZIP code in 2025, with a median sale price of $9.5 million. According to the 2025 Henley and Partners USA Wealth Report, Florida's millionaire population surged 94 percent in Miami and 112 percent in Palm Beach over the past decade, with Palm Beach County now home to more than 60 billionaires. Florida gains an average of 15,000 net millionaires annually, while California and New York continue to experience net outflows.
Palantir Technologies relocated its headquarters from Palo Alto to Denver and then to Aventura, Florida. Wells Fargo announced it was moving its wealth management division from San Francisco to West Palm Beach by year's end. Palm Beach County has been dubbed "Wall Street South" by financial press. The Miami New Times catalogued "The New Miami Gold Rush" that opened 2026, noting that the region now attracts not merely wealthy individuals but entire ecosystems — family offices, investment partnerships, and the networks of advisors, service providers, and employees that surround them.
"South Florida has become one of the most powerful concentrations of wealth in just a few years — ultra-luxury real estate FOMO is absolutely real."— DINA GOLDENTAYER, DOUGLAS ELLIMAN
What the Research Actually Shows
The academic literature on tax-induced migration is more nuanced than either side in this debate cares to acknowledge. Cornell University sociologist Cristobal Young, in his 2017 book The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight: How Place Still Matters for the Rich, found that just 2.4 percent of American millionaires move to a different state each year — compared to 2.9 percent for the general population, suggesting the wealthy are actually less mobile than average. Young and colleagues found no increase in millionaire out-migration from states that raised taxes in either 2017 or 2021; New York's 2021 millionaire surcharge is estimated to have raised approximately $3.6 billion annually with no discernible flight effect. The Fiscal Policy Institute analysis of that episode found no significant out-migration. Of millionaires who do move, only about 15 percent end up in a lower-tax jurisdiction — meaning many moves are driven by factors entirely other than taxation.
However, Young himself noted a significant complication: beginning in early 2020, millionaires began leaving high-tax states in large numbers in a pattern that matched decades of tax-flight predictions. The cause was COVID-19, not new tax legislation — but the pandemic normalized remote work and demonstrated that social and professional ties were less geographically anchored than previously assumed. Whether that behavioral shift is permanent or temporary remains the central empirical uncertainty. The pandemic may have reset the baseline mobility of high earners in ways that make historical studies — conducted under pre-remote-work norms — less predictive of future behavior.
The California case also differs structurally from prior state-level millionaire taxes in ways that may make it more disruptive than the research baseline suggests. Those prior studies examined income taxes on annual earnings; the California proposal targets net worth with a one-time levy that, for a typical tech billionaire, could equal a decade or more of income taxes in a single year. The behavioral response to a confiscatory one-time assessment may differ substantially from the response to a marginal increase in an ongoing rate. Retroactivity also creates a unique incentive not seen in prior natural experiments: the tax creates a specific calendar-date threshold, making the cost-benefit calculus of relocation unusually legible and time-sensitive for affected individuals.
The Doom-Loop Risk
The structural fiscal risk embedded in this dynamic receives insufficient attention in progressive coverage of these proposals. California's top 1 percent of taxpayers currently supplies nearly half of all state income tax collections. New York City's millionaires — roughly 1 percent of the population — pay approximately 40 percent of the city's income taxes. Washington state had no income tax at all and was funding its government heavily through sales and excise taxes that fall disproportionately on lower earners; the new millionaire tax was explicitly framed as a corrective to that regressivity.
Each of these states has constructed a fiscal architecture with an extraordinarily narrow and mobile revenue base. When even a small fraction of that base relocates — and relocates permanently, as opposed to the temporary COVID-era moves that eventually reversed in some cases — the revenue shortfall does not simply trim services proportionally. It creates a structural gap that, under progressive political logic, is filled by further tax increases on those who remain, which induces further departures, completing the cycle that critics call a "doom loop." Newsom's opposition to the California initiative reflects an implicit understanding of this mechanism. Hochul's position in New York reflects the same calculus even as she faces political pressure from her left flank, a newly popular democratic socialist mayor, and both legislative chambers backing the tax increases she opposes.
Conclusion
Atlas has not shrugged — he has filed change-of-domicile paperwork and purchased a $44 million penthouse with an ocean view. The spectacle of serial nine-figure Miami real estate purchases by the departing billionaires of California and Washington is not a policy outcome that advocates of these proposals intended; it is an unintended consequence of designing taxes in defiance of elementary behavioral economics. High earners do not move in droves under normal circumstances. But "normal circumstances" no longer obtains: the remote-work revolution has permanently altered mobility norms; pandemic-era behavioral shifts have loosened geographic ties; and the sheer scale of the proposed levies — 5 percent of net worth in a single year, or nearly 10 percent of income annually in Seattle — exceeds by orders of magnitude the incremental marginal-rate increases that prior academic studies found insufficient to trigger significant flight.
The irony is that the people most likely to pay these taxes as designed — those who either cannot or choose not to leave — will be precisely the billionaires most embedded in their communities, with the strongest place-based attachments. The people most likely to leave are the most financially sophisticated, the most mobile, and the most likely to be building the next company, funding the next startup, or endowing the next research institution. What remains is the tax base that was there before the billionaires arrived. That is not a foundation on which California, Washington, or New York can sustain the ambitious social programs these tax proposals are meant to finance.
Verified Sources & Formal Citations
-
California Secretary of State, Ballot
Initiative Filing — "Imposes One-Time Tax on Certain Individuals and
Trusts" (2026 Billionaire Tax Act). Filed October 22, 2025;
amended November 26, 2025; approved for circulation December 26, 2025.
Signature deadline: June 24, 2026.
https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-measures/initiative-and-referendum-updates -
Reiff, Nathan. "Only 6 Billionaires Left California Over Its
Proposed Wealth Tax — But They Took $27 Billion in Potential Revenue
with Them." Fortune, March 17, 2026.
https://fortune.com/2026/03/17/6-billionaires-left-california-billionaire-tax-newsom-brin-page-thiel-spielberg-revenue/ -
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA). "Rep. Kevin Kiley Introduces Bill to
Fight California's Wealth Tax." Press Release. U.S. House of
Representatives.
https://kiley.house.gov/posts/rep-kevin-kiley-introduces-bill-to-fight-californias-wealth-tax -
Baker Botts LLP. "California 2026 Billionaire Tax Act." Thought
Leadership, December 2025. (Analysis of constitutional challenges:
Dormant Commerce Clause, Due Process retroactivity, Right to Travel,
Takings Clause.)
https://www.bakerbotts.com/thought-leadership/publications/2025/december/california-2026-billionaire-tax-act -
Americans for Tax Reform. "California Wealth Tax Is Pushing
People Out of the State." January 15, 2026. (Citing David Friedberg
private poll estimate of $2–$2.5T in asset departures; San Jose Mayor
Matt Mahan quote.)
https://atr.org/california-wealth-tax-driving-people-out-of-state/ -
Fox News Digital. "Tech insider warns California tax hikes will
trigger mass billionaire exit." January 9, 2026. (California Secretary
of State filings showing Brin family office, Flu Lab, One Aero address
changes.)
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/blue-states-billionaire-exodus-about-get-much-worse-2026-warns-insider -
Fox Business. "Mark Zuckerberg and Google's Brin Close on
Massive Miami Estates Worth Over $220M Combined." March 2026.
(Zuckerberg $170M Indian Creek estate, Miami-Dade record; Page $173M
Coconut Grove acquisitions.)
https://www.foxbusiness.com/real-estate/mark-zuckerberg-googles-brin-close-massive-miami-estates-worth-over-220m-combined -
Tuccille, J.D. "Washington State Just Passed a 9.9% Income Tax on Those Making $1 Million." Reason, March 20, 2026.
https://reason.com/2026/03/17/washington-state-just-passed-a-9-9-income-tax-on-those-making-1-million/ -
Washington State Legislature, SB 6346, "Millionaires Tax."
Passed House 52–46, March 9, 2026; signed by Governor Bob Ferguson.
https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=6346&Year=2026 -
CNBC, "Marriage Penalty in Washington State's New Millionaire
Tax Stirs Debate." March 20, 2026. (Howard Schultz $44M Surfside
penthouse; Jeff Bezos $9B+ Amazon stock sold from Florida, saving
$600M+.)
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/03/20/washington-millionaire-tax-marriage.html -
CBS News. "Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz leaves Seattle as
local lawmakers mull millionaire tax." March 2026. (LinkedIn post text;
Schultz net worth $6.6B per Bloomberg.)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/howard-schultz-starbucks-ceo-leaving-seattle-washington-millionaire-tax/ -
Tax Foundation. Analysis of Washington SB 6346. (Finding
combined Seattle rate on wage income and RSU vesting exceeds 18%,
highest in the nation.)
https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/state/washington-state-income-tax/ -
Insurance Journal / Bloomberg Tax. "Millionaire Tax Advances in
Washington State as Legal Duel Looms." March 12, 2026. (Aaron Johnson,
Ballard Spahr, quote on business climate; Schultz LinkedIn post.)
https://www.insurancejournal.com/news/west/2026/03/12/861493.htm -
New York Focus. "State Legislature Backs Tax Hikes on Wealthy,
Adding Fuel to Mamdani Campaign." March 10, 2026. (Assembly +0.2pp on
$5–10M income; Senate +0.5pp on $5M+; corporate rate to 9%; mansion
tax.)
https://nysfocus.com/2026/03/10/senate-assembly-mamdani-tax-hikes -
Kiplinger. "The 'Mamdani Effect' in New York: Can the City
Afford a Millionaire Tax?" January 2, 2026. (Hochul: "I don't want to
lose any more people to Palm Beach"; proposed combined rate ~17%.)
https://www.kiplinger.com/taxes/the-mamdani-effect-in-new-york-can-the-city-afford-a-millionaire-tax - Young, Cristobal. The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight: How Place Still Matters for the Rich. Stanford University Press, 2017. (2.4% annual millionaire migration rate; no increased out-migration after 2017 or 2021 state tax increases; 15% of moving millionaires end up in lower-tax states.)
-
Young, Cristobal (Cornell University). "New York's Wealthy Warn
of a Tax Exodus After Mamdani's Win — But the Data Says Otherwise." The Conversation,
December 1, 2025. (COVID-era millionaire out-migration from high-tax
states; distinction between normal and pandemic mobility.)
https://theconversation.com/new-yorks-wealthy-warn-of-a-tax-exodus-after-mamdanis-win-but-the-data-says-otherwise-270415 -
Gothamist. "Mamdani Wants to Change the Tax Code. Here's What
That Could Look Like." December 31, 2025. (Empire Center: millionaires =
60% of revenue under Mamdani plan; Cato Institute analysis; Bob Lord /
Institute for Policy Studies.)
https://gothamist.com/news/mamdani-wants-to-change-the-tax-code-heres-what-that-could-look-like -
MIAMI REALTORS®. "South Florida Real Estate Posts Second-Most
$10M & Up Home Sales in History." January 16, 2026. (361 sales above
$10M in 2025; "Florida gains a new taxpayer every two minutes;
California loses one every minute.")
https://www.miamirealtors.com/2026/01/16/south-florida-real-estate-posts-second-most-10m-up-home-sales-in-history/ -
Henley & Partners. USA Wealth Report 2025.
(Florida: 1.18M millionaires; Miami millionaire population +94% over
decade; Palm Beach +112%; 15,000 net millionaire arrivals per year to
Florida.)
https://www.henleyglobal.com/publications/us-wealth-report -
JamesEdition. "Florida's Luxury Real Estate Boom: Beyond
Billionaire Bunkers." March 2026. (Miami luxury inquiry volume +30% YoY;
Fort Lauderdale inquiries +274%; Bal Harbour +164%.)
https://www.jamesedition.com/stories/real-estate/beyond-billionaire-bunkers-floridas-new-era-of-luxury-unfolds-in-rising-hotspots/ -
CalMatters / Dan Walters. "Opinion: Billionaires Bolt from Blue
States Amid Tax Fears, Mirroring Rebellion in 'Atlas Shrugged.'" March
17, 2026. (Governor Newsom opposition; top 1% supplies nearly half of
California income tax collections; Jack Citrin quote.)
https://calmatters.org/commentary/dan-walters/2026/03/billionaires-bolt-tax-blue-states/ -
Siena College Research Institute. Poll: 54% of New York State
voters support Mamdani millionaire tax; 62% support in New York City;
72% among Democrats statewide. Cited in Jacobin, March 2026.
https://www.siena.edu/centers-institutes/siena-college-research-institute/ -
CalMatters. "Billionaires Aren't Going to Flee California.
Others Will Without a Budget Fix." February 2, 2026. (Center on Budget
and Policy Priorities: reinstating California estate tax could generate
~$3.6B annually.)
https://calmatters.org/commentary/2026/02/billionaire-wealth-tax-california-budget/
Comments
Post a Comment