California DMV Announces 15 New Traffic Laws Taking Effect January 1, 2026

BLUF (Bottom Line Up Front): The California Department of Motor Vehicles has announced 15 new laws signed by Governor Gavin Newsom that will take effect January 1, 2026, focusing on road safety enhancements, consumer protections against automotive scams, and expanded enforcement capabilities for traffic violations. California drivers face significant new costs including $1,000 fines for license plate covers and expanded enforcement zones, balanced against consumer protections offering three-day purchase cancellation rights and parking penalty relief for low-income residents.

**SACRAMENTO, Calif.—**California motorists will face a substantially altered regulatory landscape beginning January 1, 2026, as the state Department of Motor Vehicles implements a comprehensive package of new traffic and vehicle-related legislation signed by Governor Gavin Newsom.

The new laws span four primary categories: road safety measures, consumer protection provisions, DMV modernization efforts, and equity-focused reforms. Several provisions significantly expand enforcement mechanisms and penalties for traffic violations, while others aim to address emerging technologies in the automotive sector.

Enhanced Safety Measures and Stricter Enforcement

Among the most consequential changes, Assembly Bill 1085 imposes a $1,000 fine for manufacturing devices that obscure license plates—a measure targeting toll evasion and criminal activity facilitated by illegal plate covers. The legislation represents California's response to growing concerns about vehicles evading automated toll collection and red-light camera systems.

"This addresses a serious public safety concern where individuals use these devices to avoid accountability for traffic violations and toll evasion," the DMV stated in its December 26 announcement.

Assembly Bill 390 expands California's existing "Slow Down, Move Over" law to require drivers to reduce speed and change lanes when approaching any stationary vehicle displaying hazard lights or warning devices, not just emergency vehicles. The expansion includes highway maintenance vehicles, potentially affecting millions of daily commuting scenarios.

The state is also extending its Ignition Interlock Device pilot program through January 1, 2033, under Assembly Bill 366. The program requires certain DUI offenders to install breath-testing devices in their vehicles before the engine will start.

More severe consequences await those convicted of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, as Assembly Bill 1087 increases probation terms from two years to between three and five years.

School Zone Speed Reductions Delayed Until 2031

In a notable provision with a delayed implementation timeline, Assembly Bill 382 will reduce school zone speed limits from 25 mph to 20 mph—but not until January 1, 2031. The five-year delay suggests potential concerns about implementation logistics or public acceptance of the more restrictive speed limit.

Automated Enforcement Expansion

Senate Bill 720 authorizes local governments to deploy alternative automated camera systems for red light violation enforcement, with violations subject solely to civil rather than criminal penalties. The measure could significantly expand the use of traffic cameras across California municipalities.

The legislation comes as automated traffic enforcement remains controversial in many jurisdictions, with critics citing concerns about due process, accuracy, and the profit motive in traffic enforcement.

Autonomous Vehicle Regulations

California continues adapting its vehicle code to accommodate autonomous vehicle technology. Senate Bill 480 permits autonomous vehicles to display specialized marker lamps that alert other drivers, pedestrians, and law enforcement when the vehicle's automated driving system is engaged.

The provision addresses safety concerns about distinguishing autonomous vehicles operating in self-driving mode from those under human control—particularly relevant given California's status as a primary testing ground for autonomous vehicle developers.

Consumer Protection: The CARS Act

The California Combating Auto Retail Scams (CARS) Act, enacted through Senate Bill 766, represents perhaps the most significant consumer protection measure in the package. Taking effect October 1, 2026, the law prohibits dealers from misrepresenting vehicle costs and financing terms.

Critically, the CARS Act grants consumers a three-day right to cancel purchases or leases of vehicles valued under $50,000—a provision that could substantially alter the dynamics of automotive retail transactions in California.

Assembly Bill 1272 complements these protections by prohibiting businesses holding DMV occupational licenses from using "Department of Motor Vehicles" or "DMV" in their internet domain names, targeting confusion between private services and official government functions.

Addressing Homelessness and Vehicle Abandonment

In a measure intersecting vehicle regulation with California's ongoing homelessness crisis, Assembly Bill 630 authorizes Alameda and Los Angeles Counties to remove and dispose of abandoned recreational vehicles valued at $4,000 or less through January 1, 2030, if verified as inoperable.

The temporary provision reflects the concentration of RV encampments in these urban counties and the administrative challenges of processing abandoned vehicles through standard procedures.

Equity-Focused Parking Reform

Assembly Bill 1299 addresses concerns about disproportionate impacts of parking enforcement on low-income Californians by authorizing municipalities to waive or reduce parking penalties for those unable to pay. The law requires payment plan options when requested, aiming to prevent the escalation from parking tickets to vehicle towing and lien sales.

Administrative Modernization

On the administrative front, Senate Bill 506 authorizes DMV to issue duplicate driver's licenses when individuals change addresses, expanding beyond the current limitation to lost, destroyed, or mutilated licenses. The measure aims to reduce administrative burdens for Californians relocating within the state.

Off-highway electric motorcycles gain formal classification as off-highway motor vehicles under Senate Bill 586, requiring DMV-issued identification plates and compliance with OHV regulations—reflecting the growing market for electric recreational vehicles.

Implementation and Enforcement Timeline

While most provisions take effect January 1, 2026, implementation timelines vary significantly. The CARS Act provisions won't activate until October 1, 2026, while the school zone speed limit reduction has been delayed until 2031. The RV abandonment authority for Alameda and Los Angeles Counties expires in 2030, and the extended ignition interlock program runs through 2033.

The staggered implementation suggests varying levels of complexity in regulatory development, enforcement system preparation, and stakeholder coordination required for different provisions.

Major Immediate Impacts to California Drivers: Benefits and Costs Analysis

The new legislation creates a complex matrix of immediate effects that will reshape daily driving experiences for California's approximately 27 million licensed drivers. The following analysis examines each law's practical implications.

High-Impact Safety Enforcement Measures

AB 1085: License Plate Obstruction ($1,000 Fine)

Costs to Drivers: This represents one of the most severe financial penalties in the package. Drivers who purchased aftermarket license plate covers—even decorative frames that partially obscure plate edges—could face $1,000 fines if deemed to interfere with electronic or visual reading. The law targets manufacturers but creates liability for consumers who may have unknowingly purchased non-compliant products. Thousands of California drivers currently use plate frames from dealerships, sports teams, or decorative suppliers that could potentially violate the new standard.

Benefits: The measure addresses a legitimate public safety concern. License plate obscuring devices enable toll evasion on California's extensive toll road network, including the 91 Express Lanes, FasTrak systems throughout the Bay Area, and the I-15 Express Lanes in San Diego. These devices also facilitate hit-and-run incidents, red-light violations, and other criminal activities by preventing identification. Legitimate drivers benefit from reduced toll evasion that drives up rates for compliant users and improved ability of law enforcement to identify dangerous drivers.

Net Impact: High enforcement risk with uncertain application standards. Drivers should immediately inspect their vehicles and remove any plate covers or frames before January 1 to avoid substantial fines.

AB 390: Expanded "Slow Down, Move Over" Requirements

Costs to Drivers: This significantly expands enforcement scenarios. Previously applicable mainly to emergency vehicles with flashing lights, the law now requires speed reduction and lane changes for any vehicle with hazard lights or warning devices. On California's congested freeways—particularly the I-405, I-5, and Highway 101 corridors—disabled vehicles with hazard lights are common. During rush hour, when lane changes may be difficult or impossible, drivers face potential citations for failure to move over even when traffic conditions prevent compliance. The law creates ambiguity about required actions when multiple lanes have stopped vehicles with hazards activated simultaneously.

Benefits: The expansion protects highway maintenance workers, tow truck operators, and stranded motorists who face significant injury risk on busy roadways. California highways experience numerous fatalities annually involving roadside workers and disabled vehicle occupants. The measure also encourages proactive defensive driving behavior that could reduce secondary collisions near stopped vehicles.

Net Impact: Substantially increases enforcement exposure for average drivers while providing genuine safety improvements for roadside workers. Implementation will likely require an education period as drivers adapt to the broader requirements.

SB 720: Automated Red Light Enforcement Expansion

Costs to Drivers: Local governments gain authority to deploy alternative automated camera systems beyond existing limitations. This could result in significantly expanded red-light camera coverage across California cities, increasing citation frequency. While violations carry only civil penalties (avoiding criminal record impacts), fines typically range from $100 to $500 per violation. The automated systems can generate citations for technical violations—such as wheels crossing the stop line during red—that officers might exercise discretion to excuse. Privacy advocates note these systems create extensive tracking of vehicle movements.

Benefits: Red-light running causes approximately 143,000 injuries and 800 deaths nationally each year, according to Insurance Institute for Highway Safety data. Automated enforcement provides consistent coverage that police patrols cannot match and has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing dangerous intersection violations. The civil-only penalty structure prevents the more serious consequences of criminal traffic violations. Reduced red-light violations benefit all road users at intersections.

Net Impact: Substantially expands enforcement infrastructure with associated revenue generation for municipalities. Drivers should expect more stringent intersection enforcement, particularly in cities that aggressively deploy the new systems.

Consumer Protection Measures

SB 766: California CARS Act (Three-Day Cancellation Right)

Costs to Drivers: Takes effect October 1, 2026, so no immediate January impact. When implemented, dealers may respond by incorporating cancellation risk into pricing, potentially increasing vehicle costs. The law applies only to vehicles under $50,000, creating a pricing threshold that may influence dealer pricing strategies. Some dealers might add non-refundable fees or adjust financing terms to mitigate cancellation risk.

Benefits: Provides substantial consumer protection against high-pressure sales tactics common in automotive retail. The three-day right to cancel allows buyers to reconsider financing terms, conduct independent inspections, compare insurance costs, and escape contracts made under pressure or deception. The law's prohibition on misrepresenting costs and financing terms addresses widespread complaints about dealer fee padding, hidden charges, and deceptive financing. For California's vehicle buyers, this represents a major shift in negotiating power.

Net Impact: Strongly favors consumers with minimal immediate costs. The delayed October implementation allows dealers adjustment time but fundamentally rebalances automotive retail transactions.

AB 1272: Prohibition on DMV Domain Names

Costs to Drivers: None directly. Businesses using DMV in domain names must rebrand their online presence.

Benefits: Reduces consumer confusion between private services and official DMV functions. Many Californians have paid premium fees to third-party services believing they were accessing official DMV portals. The measure protects consumers from predatory businesses charging excessive fees for services available directly from DMV at lower or no cost.

Net Impact: Pure consumer benefit with no direct costs to drivers.

DUI-Related Provisions

AB 366: Extended Ignition Interlock Program

Costs to Drivers: Affects only those convicted of specified DUI offenses. Ignition interlock devices cost approximately $70-150 for installation plus $60-80 monthly monitoring fees. For the extended program period through 2033, this represents potential costs of thousands of dollars for offenders. The devices require breath samples before starting and periodically while driving, creating inconvenience and potential embarrassment.

Benefits: Ignition interlock devices have proven highly effective at preventing repeat DUI offenses. The technology prevents vehicle operation when the driver has consumed alcohol, directly protecting public safety. The program extension allows more data collection on effectiveness and provides an alternative to longer license suspensions that prevent offenders from maintaining employment. For the broader public, reduced drunk driving incidents mean fewer accidents, injuries, and fatalities.

Net Impact: Significant costs to DUI offenders balanced against substantial public safety benefits. The program represents a behavioral intervention rather than purely punitive measure.

AB 1087: Increased Probation for Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated

Costs to Drivers: Affects only those convicted of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, a relatively small population but a serious offense. Extended probation from two years to three-to-five years means longer periods of court supervision, potential restrictions on activities, required check-ins, and associated costs. The longer supervision period may impact employment and housing opportunities.

Benefits: Longer probation provides extended oversight for individuals who have caused fatalities through intoxicated driving—arguably appropriate given the severity of the offense. Extended supervision may reduce recidivism through longer behavioral monitoring and support services. For families of victims, extended probation may provide greater sense of accountability and justice.

Net Impact: Appropriate severity increase for serious offense with minimal impact on general driving population.

Equity and Modernization Measures

AB 1299: Parking Penalty Waivers and Payment Plans

Costs to Drivers: Creates potential for reduced municipal parking enforcement revenue, which cities might offset through other fees or fines. Some jurisdictions might respond by increasing base parking fine amounts to compensate for expected waivers.

Benefits: Provides substantial relief to low-income Californians for whom parking fines create cascading financial crises. A $65 parking ticket can escalate to $380+ with late fees, then lead to vehicle towing ($300-500), storage fees ($50+ daily), and ultimately vehicle liens and loss of transportation. For individuals living paycheck-to-paycheck, this spiral can result in job loss. Required payment plan options prevent these escalations while still collecting penalties over time. The measure addresses well-documented regressive impacts of parking enforcement.

Net Impact: Significant benefit to low-income populations with minimal cost to other drivers. Represents important equity advancement in vehicle-related enforcement.

SB 506: Duplicate Licenses for Address Changes

Costs to Drivers: Involves standard DMV duplicate license fee (currently approximately $33), a modest cost compared to convenience gained.

Benefits: Eliminates bureaucratic hassle of explaining address changes without documentary proof of lost license. Californians who relocate frequently—particularly renters, students, and military personnel—can update licenses more efficiently. Reduces need to carry multiple forms of identification to prove address changes.

Net Impact: Minor convenience improvement at minimal cost. Modest administrative modernization that removes arbitrary restriction.

Delayed and Limited-Scope Provisions

AB 382: School Zone Speed Limit Reduction (Effective 2031)

Costs to Drivers: No immediate impact. When implemented in 2031, the reduction from 25 mph to 20 mph will increase travel time through school zones and may increase citation frequency as drivers adjust to new limits. The 5-mph reduction represents a 20% speed decrease, significant for traffic flow.

Benefits: Speed reductions in school zones demonstrably reduce pedestrian injury severity in collisions. At 20 mph, pedestrian survival rates in collisions exceed 90%, compared to approximately 70% at 25 mph. The five-year implementation delay allows infrastructure adjustments including signage updates and traffic signal timing modifications.

Net Impact: Delayed implementation prevents immediate impacts. When effective, safety benefits for children likely outweigh modest travel time increases.

AB 630: RV Abandonment Removal (Alameda and Los Angeles Counties Only)

Costs to Drivers: Limited geographic scope affects only two counties. RV owners in these counties face expedited removal risk if vehicles become inoperable, potentially losing vehicles valued up to $4,000 with less opportunity to reclaim them.

Benefits: Addresses significant public health and safety issues from abandoned RVs in urban areas, which can block access, create fire hazards, and contribute to sanitation problems. Streamlined removal process reduces municipal costs and neighborhood impacts. The limited scope and sunset date (January 1, 2030) create a pilot program for evaluating effectiveness.

Net Impact: Localized impact addressing specific regional problems. Benefits concentrated in affected counties with costs borne by small population of RV owners whose vehicles become inoperable.

SB 586: Electric Motorcycle Classification

Costs to Drivers: Affects only off-highway electric motorcycle owners, requiring DMV identification plates and OHV regulation compliance. Adds registration costs and administrative requirements for emerging vehicle category.

Benefits: Brings growing category of electric recreational vehicles under regulatory framework, ensuring consistency with other OHVs. Provides clear legal status for eMoto owners and facilitates law enforcement on public lands. Registration helps fund OHV trail maintenance and facilities.

Net Impact: Narrow impact on specialized vehicle category. Brings regulatory clarity to emerging market segment.

SB 480: Autonomous Vehicle Marker Lamps

Costs to Drivers: No costs to conventional vehicle operators. AV manufacturers bear equipment costs.

Benefits: Improves communication between autonomous vehicles and other road users—a genuine safety need as AVs become more common. Other drivers, pedestrians, and law enforcement can identify when vehicles operate in autonomous mode, potentially reducing confusion and improving safety around these vehicles. Particularly relevant in San Francisco and other California cities with significant AV testing.

Net Impact: Facilitates AV integration into traffic environment with no burden on conventional drivers.

Overall Impact Assessment for California Drivers

The legislative package creates a substantially more regulated and enforced driving environment with several high-cost provisions balanced against meaningful consumer protections. The most significant immediate impacts include:

High-Risk Areas for Average Drivers:

$1,000 license plate cover penalties create severe enforcement risk requiring immediate compliance checks
Expanded "Slow Down, Move Over" requirements dramatically increase potential citation scenarios on congested highways
Automated red-light enforcement expansion may substantially increase intersection citations

Significant Benefits:

Three-day vehicle purchase cancellation rights (October 2026) provide major consumer protection
Parking penalty relief prevents financial spirals for low-income Californians
Various safety measures address legitimate public safety concerns

Limited Impact:

Several provisions affect only specific populations (DUI offenders, RV owners, eMoto owners)
School zone changes delayed until 2031
Administrative modernizations provide modest convenience improvements

California drivers should prioritize immediate compliance with license plate requirements and prepare for more stringent enforcement in multiple areas while benefiting from enhanced consumer protections in vehicle purchases and parking enforcement.

California's vehicle regulations have historically served as models for other states, suggesting these measures may influence automotive policy nationwide as other jurisdictions monitor their implementation and effectiveness.

Verified Sources and Formal Citations

California Department of Motor Vehicles. "DMV Highlights New Laws in 2026." Press Release. December 26, 2025.
URL: [Document provided - official DMV announcement]
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 366 (Petrie-Norris). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 1087 (Patterson). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 382 (Berman). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 390 (Wilson). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 720 (Ashby). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 1085 (Stefani). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 630 (González). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 480 (Archuleta). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 586 (Jones). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 766 (Allen). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 1272 (Dixon). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 506 (Committee on Transportation). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill No. 1299 (Bryan). Chapter [number], Statutes of 2025.
URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/
Office of Governor Gavin Newsom. "Governor Newsom Signs Legislation [Year-End Bill Signing Announcements]." 2025.
URL: https://www.gov.ca.gov/newsroom/

Note: This article is based on the official California DMV press release dated December 26, 2025. Full legislative text and chapter numbers for each bill can be accessed through the California Legislative Information website. The benefits and costs analysis represents interpretation of likely impacts based on the legislation as described; actual implementation effects may vary depending on enforcement practices and local jurisdiction adoption patterns.

Search This Blog

The State of California

California Drivers Face New Laws in 2026