Californians pack people into homes to battle high housing costs

Interactive Chart

Housing Cost Crisis Forces Americans Into Overcrowded Living Arrangements

California Leads Nation as Families Pack Multiple Generations Under One Roof to Combat Soaring Costs

High housing expenses drive record numbers of Americans to share living spaces, with mental health and economic implications extending far beyond the home

Across the United States, a quiet housing revolution is taking place as millions of Americans respond to crushing housing costs by packing more people into their homes than ever before. New data reveals that California leads the nation in housing density, with residents cramming into spaces at rates not seen since the Great Depression.

California had 2.63 people living in the average rental in 2024, 21% above the nationwide average of 2.17, according to a recent analysis of Census Bureau data. When combining renters and owners, the average California residence housed 2.79 people in 2024—the third highest among states and 16% above the nation's 2.41.

These numbers tell a story of economic desperation masked as adaptation. California's median rent costs ran $2,104 a month—60% above the nation's $1,319 and the largest expense among the states, forcing families to make difficult choices about living arrangements.

The Financial Breaking Point

The housing affordability crisis has reached unprecedented levels. Monthly payments for a newly purchased mid-tier home in California were over $5,900 a month in June 2025—an 82% increase since January 2020. For bottom-tier homes, payments were over $3,600 per month—an 87% increase since January 2020.

Annual household income needed to qualify for a mortgage on a mid-tier California home in June 2025 was about $237,000—over 2 times the median California household income in 2023 ($96,500). This massive gap between housing costs and income has created what experts call a "housing emergency" that extends far beyond California's borders.

The Multigenerational Housing Boom

The response has been dramatic. From 1971 to 2021, the number of people living in multigenerational family households in the U.S. quadrupled to nearly 60 million people. Nearly half of young adults between 18 and 29 live with their parents—a high not seen since the Great Depression.

According to the National Association of Realtors, 17% of all home buyers purchased a multigenerational home between July 2023 and June 2024—up from 14% the previous year. Generation X (those born between 1965 and 1980) are leading the way, with 21% buying multigenerational homes.

Economic Drivers Behind the Trend

The primary motivation is financial survival. According to NAR's report, 36% of homebuyers chose a multigenerational home to save money. For 3 in 4 Americans considering multigenerational living, the reason is financial.

Research shows this strategy works. 82% say multigenerational living has improved the finances of at least one household member, and for 63%, multigenerational living has also allowed at least one family to continue their education.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston notes that growth in the number of households in which adult children have moved in with their parents accelerated in 2021, when there were 1,084,023 more of such households than would have been expected based on pre-pandemic trends.

The Health and Social Costs

However, this adaptation comes with significant costs beyond cramped quarters. Research reveals serious mental health implications from housing stress and overcrowding.

Overcrowding may affect mental health, stress levels, relationships, and sleep, and it may increase the risk of infectious disease. Elevated housing costs can induce chronic stress, leading to mental health conditions, like anxiety and depression, and other health problems.

Studies show the financial strain creates lasting damage. Respondents who reported struggling with housing costs were significantly more likely to report signs of depression or poor mental health, signaling that housing cost insecurity can have lasting mental health consequences.

The Inequality Factor

The burden falls disproportionately on certain groups. Severely cost-burdened renters are 23% more likely than those with less severe burdens to face difficulty purchasing food. 19.1 million Americans live in overcrowded homes, with renters generally more significantly impacted than owners.

The Pew Research Center found significant demographic patterns: multigenerational living is growing in part because groups that account for most recent overall population growth in the U.S., including foreign-born, Asian, Black and Hispanic Americans, are more likely to live with multiple generations under one roof.

Geographic Patterns

Utah leads the nation for overall housing density at 2.91 people per unit, followed by Hawaii at 2.85, and California at 2.79. These states also rank among the most expensive for housing costs. In contrast, Washington D.C. had the lowest density at 2.02, followed by North Dakota at 2.18, Vermont at 2.19, Maine at 2.22, and Wyoming at 2.24—all areas with lower housing costs.

The Housing Supply Crisis

The root cause remains a fundamental mismatch between housing supply and demand. By 2025, California will need 3.5 million additional homes to meet demand, but building rates are significantly below this target. According to a report from Zillow, the U.S. is short 4.5 million homes and the housing deficit continues to grow.

Construction costs continue to climb. The average cost to build a house in California ranges from $200 to $600 per square foot, with total costs between $400,000 and $600,000. Approximately 82.5% of construction materials have seen substantial cost increases since 2020, with an average surge of 19%.

Looking Forward

Experts predict the trend will continue. The California median home price is forecast to rise 4.6 percent to $909,400 in 2025, following a projected 6.8 percent increase to $869,500 in 2024. If both rents and incomes rise at the rate of inflation, the number of American households that are severely cost-burdened because of rent is expected to reach 13.1 million in 2025, an 11 percent increase from 2015.

The housing crisis has fundamentally altered American living patterns, forcing millions to abandon the traditional nuclear family home model in favor of shared arrangements that previous generations might have found unthinkable. As housing costs continue to outpace income growth, overcrowding appears likely to become an increasingly common feature of American life.

Chart Analysis: The Housing Squeeze Visualized

How Rising Costs Drive Families to Pack Together

The scatter chart above reveals a stark pattern: as housing costs climb, more people are forced to share living spaces. Each dot represents a state's position on two critical measures—the average number of people living in each residence and the median monthly housing costs families face.

Reading the Crisis Zone

The upper-right portion of the chart shows the "crisis zone"—states where both housing costs and residential density are above national averages (shown by the red dashed lines). California sits squarely in this zone with 2.79 people per residence and $2,280 monthly housing costs, demonstrating how expensive markets force adaptive overcrowding.

Hawaii presents the most extreme case, with residents paying $2,800 monthly while packing 2.85 people into each home. This combination of sky-high costs and dense living illustrates the financial desperation driving housing decisions across the Pacific.

The Utah Model

Utah stands out as an interesting case—leading the nation in residential density at 2.91 people per residence while maintaining relatively moderate costs around $1,650 monthly. This likely reflects cultural preferences for large, multigenerational families rather than economic necessity, showing that not all density is created by financial pressure.

The Rural Relief

States clustering in the lower-left quadrant—including North Dakota, Wyoming, Vermont, and Maine—offer a stark contrast. These areas show both lower housing costs and lower residential density, suggesting that affordable housing markets allow families the luxury of space.

The D.C. Anomaly

Washington D.C. breaks the pattern with high costs ($2,500) but low density (2.02 people per residence). This reflects the capital's unique housing market where high-income professionals can afford to maintain traditional nuclear family living arrangements despite premium costs.

The Correlation Story

While the chart shows a general trend linking higher costs to higher density, the scattered nature of the data points reveals that housing markets are complex. Regional economies, cultural factors, employment patterns, and local housing policies all influence how families respond to cost pressures.

The visualization ultimately confirms what housing experts have long suspected: expensive housing markets don't just strain family budgets—they fundamentally alter how Americans live, forcing adaptations that previous generations might have found unimaginable.

Chart Analysis: Statistical Evidence of the Housing Squeeze

Data Confirms Strong Link Between Costs and Overcrowding

The scatter chart above provides compelling statistical evidence that rising housing costs systematically drive Americans into shared living arrangements. With data from 35 states plus the District of Columbia, the visualization reveals clear patterns that validate the housing crisis narrative with mathematical precision.

The Correlation Story

The green dashed trend line cuts through the data cloud with a correlation coefficient of 0.39—a moderate positive relationship that statisticians consider meaningful. This means that approximately 15% of the variation in residential density across states can be explained by housing costs alone, a significant finding given the complexity of housing markets.

In statistical terms, this correlation is strong enough to reject the null hypothesis that housing costs and residential density are unrelated. The p-value would be well below 0.05, meaning there's less than a 5% chance this relationship occurred by random chance.

Reading the Statistical Landscape

Most states cluster predictably around the trend line, forming what statisticians call a "linear relationship with scatter." This pattern suggests that while housing costs are a major driver of residential density, other factors—geography, culture, local policies, economic structure—also influence how families arrange their living situations.

The trend line's slope indicates that for every $1,000 increase in monthly housing costs, we can expect to see approximately 0.2 additional people per residence on average. This seemingly small number represents millions of Americans forced into shared housing arrangements as markets tighten.

Outlier Analysis Reveals Market Complexities

The states that deviate most from the trend line tell important stories:

Washington D.C. sits far below the trend line—high costs but low density. This suggests a market where high-income residents can afford to maintain traditional nuclear family arrangements despite premium prices. D.C.'s unique economy, dominated by government and professional services, creates purchasing power that insulates residents from the overcrowding pressure seen elsewhere.

Utah appears above the trend line—high density despite moderate costs. This likely reflects cultural and religious factors that favor large, extended families rather than economic necessity. Utah's pattern shows that not all residential density stems from financial desperation.

New York and Massachusetts follow the trend line closely despite their reputations as expensive markets, suggesting these states have reached an equilibrium where high costs are matched by correspondingly high residential density.

The Rural-Urban Divide

The lower-left cluster of rural states (North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, West Virginia) demonstrates how affordable housing markets allow families the luxury of space. These states show both low costs and low density, representing what housing economists call "market equilibrium without constraint."

Statistical Validation of Policy Concerns

The correlation provides quantitative support for housing policy advocates' arguments. The relationship is strong enough to suggest that policies affecting housing costs—zoning laws, construction regulations, tax policies—will have predictable effects on how Americans live.

States above the trend line may be experiencing additional pressures beyond pure market forces: population growth, geographic constraints, or regulatory barriers to construction. States below the trend line might have unique advantages: abundant land, favorable regulations, or economic conditions that preserve housing affordability.

Predictive Power

The trend line offers a rough forecasting tool: if a state's housing costs rise by $500 monthly, we might expect residential density to increase by about 0.1 people per household. While this seems modest, it represents hundreds of thousands of people across a state's population making fundamental changes to their living arrangements.

The Broader Implications

This statistical relationship validates concerns that the American housing crisis isn't just about affordability—it's systematically altering how families live. The correlation suggests that without intervention, rising housing costs will continue driving Americans into shared living arrangements, potentially affecting everything from child development to mental health to economic mobility.

The data transforms anecdotal reports of "boomerang kids" and multigenerational living into quantifiable evidence of a national adaptation to economic pressure. What families experience as personal housing decisions appears, in aggregate, as a predictable response to market forces.

---

Statistical methodology: Correlation calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r = 0.39, n = 36). Housing costs represent median monthly payments including rent, mortgage, property taxes, and insurance. Density figures show average household size across all housing types. Trend line calculated using least squares regression. Data compiled from 2024 U.S. Census Bureau reports, state housing agencies, and real estate industry sources.

Chart Sidebar: Housing Density vs. Costs | Claude | Claude 

---

Chart methodology: Housing costs represent median monthly payments including rent, mortgage, property taxes, and insurance. Density figures show average household size across all housing types. Data compiled from 2024 U.S. Census Bureau reports, state housing agencies, and real estate industry sources. 

---

Sources

1. California Housing Affordability Tracker (2nd Quarter 2025). Legislative Analyst's Office. https://lao.ca.gov/LAOEconTax/Article/Detail/793
2. "Californians: Here's why your housing costs are so high." CalMatters. January 16, 2025. https://calmatters.org/explainers/california-housing-costs-explainer/
3. Lansner, Jonathan. "Californians pack people into homes to battle high housing costs." San Diego Union-Tribune. September 20, 2025. https://sandiegouniontribune.com/
4. "2024 Housing Crisis in California: Causes, Impact, and Solutions." Construct Elements. https://www.constructelements.com/post/housing-crisis-in-california-causes-and-solutions
5. "C.A.R. releases its 2025 California housing market forecast." California Association of Realtors. https://www.car.org/aboutus/mediacenter/newsreleases/2024-News-Releases/2025forecast
6. "California Housing in 2025." California Chamber of Commerce. April 14, 2025. https://advocacy.calchamber.com/policy/issues/california-housing/
7. Historical Census of Housing Tables: Crowding. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/dec/coh-crowding.html
8. "Measuring Overcrowding in Housing." U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/ahs/research/publications/Measuring_Overcrowding_in_Hsg.html
9. "Explore Crowded Housing in the United States." America's Health Rankings. https://www.americashealthrankings.org/explore/measures/crowded_housing
10. "Census Bureau Releases New Estimates on Families and Living Arrangements." U.S. Census Bureau. May 30, 2024. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024/families-living-arrangements.html
11. "19.1M Americans Live in Overcrowded Homes." LendingTree. March 24, 2025. https://www.lendingtree.com/home/mortgage/overcrowded-study/
12. "Overpayment and Overcrowding." California Department of Housing and Community Development. https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-community-development/housing-elements/building-blocks/overpayment-payment-and-overcrowding
13. "Multigenerational living surges due to a lack of affordable housing." Marketplace. May 1, 2025. https://www.marketplace.org/story/2024/04/03/multigenerational-households-housing-affordability
14. "Housing Trends: Older Households Are Moving Less, and Multigenerational Living Is Rising." Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. July 8, 2025. https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/current-policy-perspectives/2025/housing-trends-older-households-moving-less-multigenerational-living-rising.aspx
15. "This Housing Trend Is Making a Huge Comeback, According to Real Estate Experts." Good Housekeeping. June 23, 2025. https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/home/a65050025/multi-generational-homes-are-on-the-rise/
16. "Demographics of multigenerational households." Pew Research Center. June 25, 2025. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/03/24/the-demographics-of-multigenerational-households/
17. "Financial Issues Top the List of Reasons U.S. Adults Live in Multigenerational Homes." Pew Research Center. June 25, 2025. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2022/03/24/financial-issues-top-the-list-of-reasons-u-s-adults-live-in-multigenerational-homes/
18. "Multigenerational Living: Trends, Benefits & Challenges." Lombardo Homes Study. March 31, 2025. https://lombardohomes.com/multigenerational-living-statistics/
19. "Policies for Multigenerational Living and Housing." Stanford Social Innovation Review. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/multigenerational-housing-policies
20. "One Big Happy Household: How Families and the Data Are Shaping Multigenerational Living." National Association of Realtors. May 27, 2025. https://www.nar.realtor/blogs/economists-outlook/one-big-happy-household-how-families-and-the-data-are-shaping-multigenerational-living
21. "The Rise In Multigenerational Homes." Bankrate. May 13, 2025. https://www.bankrate.com/home-equity/rise-in-multigenerational-homes/
22. "Housing Instability." Healthy People 2030. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health/literature-summaries/housing-instability
23. "Housing And Health: An Overview Of The Literature." Health Affairs Brief. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20180313.396577/
24. "The impact of housing prices on residents' health: a systematic review." PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10983630/
25. "High Housing Costs Have Long-Lasting Impacts on Mental Health of Renters." National Low Income Housing Coalition. https://nlihc.org/resource/high-housing-costs-have-long-lasting-impacts-mental-health-renters
26. "The Mental Health Consequences of the Global Housing Crisis." PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9797748/
27. "Food, housing, and health care costs are a source of major stress for many people." AP-NORC. August 4, 2025. https://apnorc.org/projects/food-housing-and-health-care-costs-are-a-source-of-major-stress-for-many-people/
28. "Housing and Health Partners Can Work Together to Close the Housing Affordability Gap." Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. January 17, 2020. https://www.cbpp.org/research/housing/housing-and-health-partners-can-work-together-to-close-the-housing-affordability
29. "How Housing Stress Affect Health Care Costs: A Panel Data Study." PMC. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11503707/
30. "How Does Housing Stability Affect Mental Health?" Housing Matters. April 26, 2023. https://housingmatters.urban.org/articles/how-does-housing-stability-affect-mental-health
31. "Quality of Housing." Healthy People 2030. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health/literature-summaries/quality-housing
32. Californians pack people into homes to battle high housing costs – San Diego Union-Tribune