California Supreme Court Orders Fresh Review of Controversial Rooftop Solar Cuts:

What Homeowners Need to Know

Bottom Line: California's highest court has given solar advocates a significant victory by ordering a lower court to reconsider controversial regulations that slashed rooftop solar compensation by up to 80%. Combined with federal tax credit eliminations, the solar market faces unprecedented challenges.

The California Supreme Court unanimously ruled August 8 that a state appeals court improperly deferred to utility regulators when upholding dramatic cuts to rooftop solar compensation. The decision sends the case back for a fresh review of Net Energy Metering 3.0 (NEM 3.0), regulations that environmental groups argue violate state climate laws.

The Core Issue

Under previous versions of California's net metering program (NEM 1.0 and 2.0), homeowners received credit at retail electricity rates for excess solar power sent back to the grid—typically 20-30 cents per kilowatt-hour. NEM 3.0, implemented in April 2023, reduced this to "avoided cost" compensation of approximately 4-8 cents per kilowatt-hour, representing roughly an 80% cut in benefits.

The change applies only to solar systems installed after April 2023. Existing solar customers maintain their original compensation rates for 20 years from installation, meaning a homeowner who installed panels in 2018 keeps retail-rate compensation until 2038 before switching to NEM 3.0 rates.

Market Impact Has Been Severe

California's residential solar market has experienced significant contraction since NEM 3.0 took effect. The policy change reduced average monthly electricity bill savings from solar installations by approximately $63, according to industry analysis. Multiple solar companies have reported layoffs and business closures as installations plummeted.

California has approximately 2 million rooftop solar systems statewide—more than any other state. The market downturn threatens the state's ambitious clean energy goals, which call for carbon neutrality by 2045.

Legal Battle Overview

Three environmental organizations—the Center for Biological Diversity, Environmental Working Group, and San Diego-based Protect Our Communities Foundation—sued the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in 2023, arguing NEM 3.0 violates state laws requiring net metering policies to support solar growth, particularly in disadvantaged communities.

A state appeals court initially sided with the CPUC in December 2023, applying what the Supreme Court called "unduly deferential" review standards. The high court's 18-page decision reversed this ruling, citing 1998 legislative changes that subjected the CPUC to the same judicial review standards as other state agencies.

"The CPUC is not above the law," said Roger Lin, senior attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity. The Supreme Court's decision requires the appeals court to actually evaluate whether the regulations comply with state statutes rather than simply deferring to the commission's interpretation.

Utility Industry Position

California's three major investor-owned utilities—San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), Southern California Edison, and Pacific Gas & Electric—have defended NEM 3.0, arguing previous policies created unfair "cost shifts" that forced non-solar customers to subsidize grid maintenance costs.

CPUC spokesperson Terrie Prosper emphasized that current regulations remain in effect during the legal review: "We are pleased that the CPUC's decision will remain in effect as an important part of controlling electricity bills."

The utilities commission's 260-page NEM 3.0 decision included incentives for pairing solar with battery storage systems, which advocates say doesn't offset the dramatic reduction in solar compensation.

Federal Policy Compounds Challenges

The solar industry faces additional pressure from federal policy changes. President Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill," signed July 4, 2025, eliminates the 30% federal residential solar tax credit effective December 31, 2025—nearly a decade ahead of schedule.

This federal credit typically saves homeowners $8,000-$10,000 on average installations. Combined with NEM 3.0's reduced compensation, the elimination could extend solar payback periods from 8-10 years to 15-20 years, depending on local electricity rates.

For homeowners considering solar in 2025, time is critical. Installation timelines typically require 2-4 months, and industry experts expect significant demand as the federal deadline approaches.

What's Next

The appeals court must now schedule new hearings and brief filings. Roger Lin estimates a new hearing could occur within 3-4 months. Environmental groups will argue that NEM 3.0 improperly ignored benefits of distributed solar generation, including reduced transmission infrastructure needs and grid resilience improvements.

Independent analysis contradicts utility claims about cost-shifting, finding that rooftop solar provided $1.5 billion in grid benefits during 2024 rather than creating $8 billion in costs as utilities argued.

The case's outcome could significantly impact California's clean energy trajectory and set precedent for utility commission oversight statewide.

Consumer Implications

For Current Solar Owners: Existing systems maintain their original compensation rates for their 20-year terms. After that period expires, they'll transition to lower NEM 3.0 rates.

For Prospective Buyers: The combination of reduced state compensation and eliminated federal tax credits creates a narrow window for favorable solar economics. Systems must be installed by December 31, 2025, to qualify for the 30% federal credit.

For Policy Watchers: The Supreme Court's emphasis on proper judicial review of utility decisions could influence future energy policy challenges beyond solar, potentially affecting electric vehicle infrastructure, energy storage programs, and grid modernization initiatives.

California's solar market stands at a crossroads, with legal, regulatory, and federal policy changes converging to reshape the landscape for residential renewable energy adoption.

---

Winners and Losers: How the Supreme Court Decision Affects Key Players

WINNERS

Solar Installation Companies

• Potential revival of installation demand if NEM 3.0 is overturned or modified
• California Solar & Storage Association welcomed the decision, with Executive Director Brad Heavner noting: "We really need to increase the rate of rooftop solar installation"
• Short-term boost possible from federal tax credit deadline rush through December 2025

Solar Equipment Manufacturers

• Renewed policy uncertainty could drive equipment stockpiling by installers
• Potential market expansion if more favorable compensation returns
• However, federal tariff threats and tax credit elimination create offsetting headwinds

Environmental Groups and Solar Advocates

• Clear legal victory establishing that utility regulators aren't "above the law"
• Opportunity to present new evidence about distributed solar benefits in appeals court rehearing
• Strengthened position for future regulatory challenges

Existing Solar Customers

• No immediate impact—current compensation rates protected for full 20-year terms
• Potential long-term benefits if appeals court orders more favorable future rates

LOSERS

California's Major Utilities

• SDG&E, Southern California Edison, and Pacific Gas & Electric face renewed legal scrutiny of their cost-shift arguments
• Potential loss of NEM 3.0 protections that currently limit solar compensation payments
• Must defend their position that rooftop solar creates $8 billion in grid costs (disputed by independent analysis showing $1.5 billion in benefits)

Utility Ratepayers Without Solar

• Continued uncertainty about long-term electricity rate impacts
• May face higher costs if utilities must increase compensation to solar customers
• Could benefit from lower grid infrastructure costs if distributed solar reduces transmission needs

MIXED OUTCOMES

Prospective Solar Customers

• Potential upside: Appeals court could order more favorable compensation rates
• Definite downside: Federal tax credit elimination after December 31, 2025
• Current reality: Must navigate conflicting policy signals when making expensive, long-term investments

Solar Industry Workers

• Short-term opportunity: Expected installation rush before federal deadline
• Long-term uncertainty: Industry employment depends on ultimate appeals court decision and overall policy environment
• Current challenge: Significant layoffs already occurred after NEM 3.0 implementation

The Supreme Court decision creates a complex landscape where traditional winners and losers may find their positions reversed depending on the appeals court's ultimate ruling and federal policy developments.

---

Sources

1. California Supreme Court. Environmental Working Group v. California Public Utilities Commission, Case No. S283614. August 8, 2025. Available at: https://www4.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S283614.PDF
2. Environmental Working Group. "EWG statement on California Supreme Court decision in rooftop solar lawsuit." August 8, 2025. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/statement/2025/08/ewg-statement-california-supreme-court-decision-rooftop-solar
3. Kennedy, Ryan. "California Supreme Court orders solar net metering policy to be rereviewed by Appeals Court." PV Magazine USA, August 7, 2025. https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2025/08/07/california-supreme-court-orders-solar-net-metering-policy-to-be-rereviewed-by-appeals-court/
4. Nikolewski, Rob. "California's rooftop solar rules in limbo after state Supreme Court ruling." San Diego Union-Tribune, August 8, 2025. https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2025/08/07/californias-rooftop-solar-rules-in-limbo-after-state-supreme-court-ruling/
5. CalMatters. "California Supreme Court hands victory to rooftop solar panel owners." August 8, 2025. https://calmatters.org/economy/2025/08/california-supreme-court-rules-on-net-metering-cuts/
6. Misbrener, Kelsey. "NEM 3.0 gets another day in court." Solar Power World, August 8, 2025. https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2025/08/california-supreme-court-rules-lower-court-must-revisit-nem-3-0-ruling/
7. CBS Los Angeles. "California Supreme Court rules rooftop solar credit rollback needs revisiting, rejecting deference to CPUC." August 7, 2025. https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/california-supreme-court-rooftop-solar-credits-cpuc-environmental-groups/
8. Solar.com. "Trump and the Fate of the 30% Solar Tax Credit in 2025." August 2025. https://www.solar.com/learn/trump-and-the-fate-of-the-30-solar-tax-credit/
9. GreenLancer. "Residential Solar Tax Credit Going Away After 2025." August 4, 2025. https://www.greenlancer.com/post/solar-tax-credit-going-away
10. EnergySage. "President Trump Signs Bill Killing The solar Tax Credit—Here's What it Means for Homeowners." July 2025. https://www.energysage.com/news/congress-passes-bill-ending-residential-solar-tax-credit/
11. NPR. "Federal tax credits for home solar and EVs will disappear soon." July 16, 2025. https://www.npr.org/2025/07/16/nx-s1-5462190/trump-tax-credit-solar-ev-heat-pump
12. NPR. "Power prices are expected to soar under new tax cut and spending law." July 15, 2025. https://www.npr.org/2025/07/15/nx-s1-5461128/congress-energy-tax-credit-solar-wind
13. NAHB. "What to Know About Expiring Energy Tax Credits." July 2025. https://www.nahb.org/blog/2025/07/expiring-energy-tax-credits